beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.09 2018고단1144

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 15, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Suwon Friwon method, and a summary order of KRW 7 million for the same crime at the same court on November 23, 2016, respectively.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 25, 2018, Defendant 1 violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) provisions on prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol two or more times, and driven a D-wheel car owned by Defendant 1 while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.134% in the section of about 6km from the road near 1052 to the front road of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the alcohol level of which is 0.134%.

2. The defendant, who violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle with the above lowest Paint.

Defendant 1 driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.134% in blood during the above day, and driven the road of four lanes in front of the Sinwon-si C in the direction of the network shooting distance, two lanes in the direction of the heating construction shooting distance in the direction of the network.

At the time of night and there is a long distance that has a signal at the front door, so there was a duty of care to accurately manipulate the steering gear, brake system, etc. of the vehicle to the person engaged in driving, and to safely drive the vehicle in the front door and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent when he neglected to do so under the influence of alcohol and neglected to do so and neglected to do so, and the lower part of the F QM6 car driven by the Victim E (S 49) waiting for the signal was the front part of the Defendant’s car in front of the above high PM6 car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s negligence in the course of performing the foregoing duties for a period of two weeks in need of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident-related statement of E;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;