except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 1, 2018, at around 03:00, the Defendant suffered an injury from the victim D (the years of age 18) who was a franch in the instant singing room located in Youngcheon-si B, around 03:0, in a sudden fashion of the victim D (the years of age 18). The Defendant sent the victim his own cryp to “hacking so that he would collapse in the inside, he would be compensated.” The victim’s snow and sckes about 10 times in drinking, moving the place, leaving the victim’s face about 10 times in drinking as he moved to a variable parking lot, followed by the victim’s hand-on 10 times in order for the victim to receive approximately 14 days medical treatment.

2. Following the assault in the preceding paragraph, at around 04:00 on the same day, the Defendant forced the victim to take advantage of the F convenience store located in Yongcheon-si, Yongcheon-si, Chungcheongnamcheon-si, the Defendant purchased the pentle, mera, and knife at the convenience store, followed the Defendant’s purchase of the pentle and mera, and made the victim see the pentle and mera, and deposited the repair cost by March 1, 2018.”

In addition, the Defendant: (a) stated the knife purchased as above to the victim; (b) stated that “the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

Accordingly, the defendant forced the victim to perform an act of non-performance of obligation by threatening the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to D and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 324 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is very poor in the nature of the crime of this case, the defendant reflects the defendant, the defendant agrees with the victim, and the defendant is the first offender.