2. In full view of the factors indicated in the records and arguments of this case, such as the fact that there are several records of the same criminal conduct in the judgment, that one month has not passed since the end of the repeated crime period due to the crime of the same criminal act, which led to the crime of this case, that the fraudulent conduct using electronic commerce leads to a large number of victims, and that there is a large amount of victims, and that there is no agreement with the victims, etc., the lower court’s sentencing against the Defendant seems to be reasonable by fully taking into account all the circumstances including the various reasons for sentencing alleged by the Defendant, including the fact that the amount of damage is relatively small, its total sum is not significant, and that the confession of the crime and its reflection are against it, and there is no special circumstance to change the sentence of the lower court otherwise.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to do so. It is so decided as per Disposition.