However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant from July 25, 2014 to the same year.

9. From May 1, 200 to the fourth floor of the building in Seo-gu Daejeon, "C" was operated on the 4th floor of the building in Seo-gu Daejeon, and the above location was leased in the name of the defendant, purchased the Sejong-do and the Red Seas, and kept them at the above location, and had DNA employed as an employee engage in sexual intercourse with many unspecified customers, and the rest of the defendant, who received KRW 120,000 from customers, paid KRW 70,000 to the employee,

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Control photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of real estate lease agreement;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment, comprehensively, with respect to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following grounds for sentencing and the conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act shall be taken into account):

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [based on the calculation of an additional collection charge] The purpose of this Act is to deprive a woman of unlawful profits from the act of arranging sexual traffic in order to eradicate the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. Thus, expenses, such as taxes, etc. incurred by the criminal in the course of performing the act of arranging sexual traffic, are not merely a method of consuming the money and goods acquired in return for the act of arranging sexual traffic or a method of justifying his/her act, and it does not constitute a deduction from the amount of the additional collection (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Do1392, Jun. 26, 2008). However, the amount of sexual traffic paid to a woman engaged in sexual traffic is expected to be paid