2. It is recognized that the Defendant appears that all of the instant crimes were led to the confession of the Defendant and the attitude against the mistake, and that the Defendant does not seem to have good health conditions for the recipients of basic living in 1943.

However, in full view of the facts that the Defendant had been subject to criminal punishment several times in the past, and there was no change of circumstances that could otherwise determine the age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment appears to be within a reasonable and appropriate scope and is unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.