beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.19 2017노2580

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are circumstances to consider the fact that the defendant is led to confession and reflect, the court below seems to have determined punishment in consideration of the fact that the court below committed the crime of this case during the period of suspension of execution of the same crime, the defendant continued to purchase and administer phiphones while being investigated by the High Court 3027 case, the defendant did not have a large number of times when phiphones were administered with other persons, and up to the act of spreading phiphones, such as administering phiphones with other persons, and taking full account of all the factors such as the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment against the defendant is appropriate.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.