When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant was delegated by the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries with the inspection of ship's articles, such as life jackets and waterproof clothes, and was engaged in the work of Korea's ship inspector who is an incorporated association.

Upon receipt of an application for examination of the relevant ship's article from a person who has obtained type approval for the manufacture of the ship's article, the Korea Prepaid Corporation shall issue a certificate of examination only for those ship's article which passed the examination after confirming the process of manufacture, parts, materials and respective parts of the ship's article, and confirming whether they are manufactured in accordance with the specifications of manufacture, and whether they meet the standards for examination.

D Co., Ltd. (Representative E) which is located in Ansan-si with approval from the head of the Korea Coast Guard in the Pyeongtaek-si site and the type of a waterproof clothes manufacturing from the Administrator of the Korea Coast Guard on September 10, 2010 submitted an application for examination to the Korea Prepaid Korea, an incorporated association, in order to undergo an examination of the waterproof clothes 42 punishment manufactured at the same place of business, and the Defendant was designated as the inspector.

However, on September 14, 2010, although the Defendant did not directly examine whether the said waterproof clothes were manufactured in accordance with the manufacturing specifications, whether they meet the standards for verification, etc., the Defendant issued a false certificate of verification, as if he passed the verification, by entering the contents of “F”, “F” in the name column, “Im Mits”, “G” in the specification column, “G”, and “39” in the quantity column, etc., into the document number column using the computer located in the prepaid office of Korea, an incorporated association, and issued a false certificate of verification.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the inspection of the goods for the ship of the Korean Prepaid H, which is an incorporated corporation through fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of a witness I, J and K;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Statement by the police concerning L;

1. Copies of police statements made against M;

1. A copy of the results of the performance test test of N illegally produced DNA life jackets;

1.The issuance of false certificates of accreditation by the inspectors of advance payment to Korea; and