beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2019.01.10 2018고합26

강간

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Victim B (a) resided in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, and from early August 2017 to September 2017, while selling “D” broadcasting services (including at least 110 won per unit, at least 110 won, at least 11,000 won (including value-added tax)), which can support the broadcaster, real-time broadcast-based broadcast-based one media platform site, and “E- Admission Rights,” which can be admitted to broadcasting exceeding the limit of the number of viewers designated in advance by the broadcaster.

In the case of Brod't (BJ, Brod'ast Jocky) a person who has broadcasted an individual music, and the Defendant was a person who had the victim defended with the victim while viewing the Internet personal broadcasting held by the victim as a member of the above website.

On August 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while viewing the personal broadcasting of the victim on the D website at around 21:00, the Defendant: (b) donated the victim’s “Haart”, which is an item of the market price of KRW 1,248,600 (excluding value-added tax) to the victim, for the purpose of viewing the victim’s reconcing the victim’s reconcing at the D site “Tt” at the D site, and (c) deposited the remainder after deducting the amount of 55% out of the amount of the Ht settlement, from the D’s perspective, into the BJ account (excluding taxes, etc.); (d) however, if the Defendant filed an application for reconcing any Ht gift gifted to B from the viewers, no proceeds shall be paid to BJ.

(5 pages of the record of examination of the victim). The victim completed the broadcast according to the above notice and 23:00 on the same day, and dices with the defendant first, who had been in Daejeon around the same day.

Since then, the victim suspended personal broadcasting due to personal circumstances, and the victim avoided the answer despite the defendant's repeated liaison, the defendant left a page where "the defendant would make a request for refund to the dispatched cargo" to the victim, and let the D operator communicate with the victim.