For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court determined guilty of the facts charged against the Defendant and rejected the Defendant’s claim of mental disability.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on mental and physical disorder.

In addition, the Defendant stated in the sign of the appellate brief that “the court below erred by violating the Constitution, laws, orders, or rules, or by misunderstanding the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment,” and did not state specific reasons, it cannot be deemed a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.