beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.17 2015고단1272 (1)

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a licensed real estate agent office in Daejeon-gu E with the trade name of “F”, and the victim AW, known to the general public, operates Lestop.

When finding a method of recovering damages from the perspective of damage, the victim was aware of the fact that there was a lot of money to make investments in real estate and credit business, while soliciting investments, on February 2014, the victim was able to receive retirement allowances equivalent to 200 million won through voluntary retirement in the workplace.

1. Around February 2014, the Defendant stated that, “Around February 2014, the Defendant would make bonds available to the Defendant in the office of Defendant’s management by means of tax calculation, making 10% profits per month when investing 50 million won or more, make an investment in the entertainment room, and use the bond in obtaining an office.”

However, if the defendant received an investment from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to make profits to the victim due to his personal repayment of debt.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim as above, and the Defendant’s affiliation from the victim is KRW 1350,000,000 from February 26, 2014 and the same year.

3. 4. 60 million won and the same year; and

3. 5 million won in case of 18.18, and the same year;

4. 12. 2.7 million won and the same year; and

4. Three million won in case of 17.17.

4. On 25. 25. 25. 4.5 million won was remitted and remitted to 76.55 million won.

2. Around February 2014, the Defendant: “AX-gun, Taenam-gun, Taenam-gun, entered into a contract with the victim; the down payment was KRW 90 million; and the down payment was KRW 10 million at the introduction cost; thus, the Defendant sent KRW 16 million to the victim by telephone.”

However, when the defendant received investment from the victim under the pretext of purchasing the above land, he was thought to use it in debt repayment, etc., and in fact there was no intention to purchase the above land for the victim or divide investment profits.

Nevertheless, the Defendant.