For reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court affirmed the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant of each part of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), and the fraud on December 31, 208.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the exercise of forged official documents and the criminal intent of defraudation.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.