마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
1.20,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant is not a narcotics handler.
1. On September 2015, the Defendant issued approximately 0.35 grams of Mesofts (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) to E, which is a local mental medicine, on the street in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and received Melopon.
2. On November 30, 2016, the Defendant issued and received 0.2 gramphonephones from the D’s street in the Jung-gu Daejeon Daejeon Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) to the above E without compensation.
3. On December 20, 2016, the Defendant administered philophones by means of drinking 0.1g of philophones in the Gel 702 in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, by drinking 0.1g of philophones.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Copy of the police interrogation protocol regarding E;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written appraisal;
1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., for which the relevant provision of the Act and the selection of a punishment are applicable to a crime (or selection of imprisonment);
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. The fact that the instant crime was committed immediately after the suspension period, even after being sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under the proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act, was considered as a condition of aggravation of punishment and the fact that it reflects the fact that it was committed as a condition of mitigation of punishment;