1. Examining various circumstances, such as the age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment of the defendant and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “the defendant”), the relationship between the victims, the motive, means and consequence of each crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. recorded in the records of the case of the defendant, the sentencing of the court of first instance, which maintained the judgment of the court of first instance which sentenced life imprisonment to the defendant, is extremely unfair even in light of the circumstances asserted in the grounds of appeal.

The Defendant indicated on the cover of the grounds of appeal that “the lower court erred by violating the Constitution, Acts, orders, or rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment,” but did not state specific grounds for such indication. Therefore, this is not a legitimate ground of appeal.

2. When the defendant for whom the request for attachment order is filed files a final appeal with respect to a prosecuted case, it shall be deemed that the final appeal has been filed.

However, the grounds for appeal were not stated in the petition of appeal, and the appellate brief did not state the grounds for appeal.

3. The Defendant’s final appeal is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.