beta
(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2014.04.24 2013가단7041

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The Defendant, on March 20, 201, based on the completion of the prescriptive acquisition on March 20, 2012, as to the Plaintiff’s 243 square meters in Gyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is the present owner of 243 square meters in Gyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. Around May 11, 1937, the Plaintiff’s lighting grid D was converted into the area unit of 322 square meters ( October 1, 1999, 16, 064 square meters) around 11, 1937.

(F) only a statement of names below F

(2) around December 14, 1961, the G field 430 square meters and the G field adjacent thereto were divided into a 268 square meters and an I field 744 square meters from the said G land.

Accordingly, the area of G land was reduced to 410 square meters.

On March 5, 1981, the transfer of ownership was made in the name of J under the Act on Special Measures for the Management of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on the ground of sale on January 10, 1960.

J around April 15, 1987, upon K's sale, completed the registration of ownership transfer for reasons of sale, and K had completed the registration of ownership transfer for reasons of sale to the defendant around August 8, 1991.

Around May 16, 2013, the Defendant divided the instant land into 744 square meters in the said I field.

3) On March 20, 1992, the above G and H land transferred ownership under the name of L, which is the largest child of D on the ground of Australia inheritance (which was November 13, 1957), and on the same day, the registration of ownership transfer was again made under the name of M, which is the Plaintiff’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s her son’s son.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On March 20, 1992, M, the Plaintiff’s 1st Plaintiff’s assertion of the parties, was donated from L to L, and cultivated as dry field upon donation of G and H. M. M.