If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Cenz motor vehicle.

On December 19, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 19:40 on December 19, 2016, and led to the speed of about 71 km from the arche apartment road to the second apartment road from the arche apartment road to the speed of about 38 meters in the direction of Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu.

Since there is a road that is designated as a child protection zone and the traffic speed of motor vehicles, etc. is limited to 30 km per hour, drivers have the duty of care to observe the restricted speed and safely drive the motor vehicle while driving the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, while driving at a speed exceeding 40 km/h, caused the victim D (14) who crosses the road from the right side of the direction to the left side to go beyond the ground.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the above victim due to the above occupational negligence, i.e., the upper part of the upper part of the body of the bones of Fullle, which requires approximately eight weeks medical treatment, or the pulmonary bones of the bones of Fule.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to survey reports, photographs, diagnostic certificates, and traffic accident analysis reports;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The punishment provided for in Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act and Article 70(2) of the Criminal Act that the victim is light due to the excessive driving of the defendant for the reason that the punishment is imposed;

In light of the fact that the defendant suffered unexpected injury, the responsibility of the defendant shall not be denied.

However, the victim's unauthorized crossing was also the cause of this case, and thereafter the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim, the defendant's same power has been very long, and the defendant has been divided in depth into his own mistake.