If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On June 30, 2014, at least 01:10, the Defendant: (a) stated that “Dnaart club” located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Annsan-si, was driven by another customer with his age club prior to driving away, and that “E entering a restaurant, “I knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif knif.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning police officers' investigation and crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In order to establish a legal order on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order and eradicate the light of the public authority, the defendant’s strict punishment is required, together with the fact that there is one time to punish the defendant with violence-related criminal records, and that the defendant seriously reflects the defendant’s wrong, the defendant appears to have committed the instant crime contingently, and the defendant seems to have committed the instant crime by resisting the police officer’s control act, and the defendant seems to have been a police officer with good selling. The defendant has no criminal records other than the criminal records of interference with official duties and fines, the defendant has no criminal records other than the criminal records of interference with official duties and fines, the family situation of the defendant, and all other sentencing conditions