2. In full view of the factors such as the Defendant’s criminal punishment for multiple types of frauds and the three times among them, the Defendant again commits the instant frauds during the repeated crime period following the completion of the execution of punishment due to the same type of frauds, and the fact that the Defendant did not recover damage therefrom, and the factors of favorable sentencing, such as the fact that the total amount of damage caused by frauds cannot be deemed to exceed KRW 2.7 million, and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines (one year to four years), the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unjustifiable and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.