예배방해
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) was announced by the I wood company, which was not scheduled as a winner while the “L award ceremony” was being followed, which is distinguished from worships, and distinguished from worships, the Defendant made a statement as described in the facts charged.
Therefore, such a situation is merely a form of award and cannot be seen as a preparatory stage closely related to worship or worship time, and thus, the Defendant did not interfere with the worship itself, and the Defendant’s act cannot be seen as “disorder” that makes the Defendant impossible, difficult, or interfered with the peace performance of worship or worship, and the Defendant did not have any intention to interfere with worship.
Therefore, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. First of all, the Defendant asserts that “e.g.,” itself does not interfere with the determination.
According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the following facts are as follows: (i) from September 11, 2013 to September 2, 2013, the “H Wood Commemorative Association” (hereinafter “the instant Commemorative Association”) under the sponsor of the Edembling Association (hereinafter “Edemb Association”) was in charge of the “Edembing during the third cycle of H” in the “Edembe F”; and (ii) the aforementioned memorial program was scheduled to be carried out in the order of “Edembiance - Edembi - Edembi - Edembi - Sar - Sarri - Har - Har - Har - Har - Har - Sar - Har - Hambar - Hambar - Har - Sar Dom - Sar - Sarbibien Do,” and the Defendant was under the influence of I’s seat immediately after the instant program.