If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On September 1, 2013, from around 21:20 to 21:50 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) saw the victim C’s “D” cosmetics operated by the victim C in Nam-gu Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, for the reason that the drinking volume of the spackers installed by the victim for his business operation is too high so that it can grow up; (b) made the victim spacks, spacks, spacks, and spacks, spacks, and spacks the victim and its customers. (c) The Defendant saw the victim and its customers who find the above spacks as “this spacks,” and (d) took the Defendant’s mobile phone into the above spacks, thereby getting the customers out of the above spacks.

The Defendant, by force, interfered with the victim’s business of selling cosmetics.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 313 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.