2. Although the judgment of the court below has favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and made a confession of the crime of this case before the judgment became final and conclusive, the crime of this case was not affected by the judgment, that there was no record of the same crime, that there was no record of fine, that there was a record of the crime of fine, that there was no record of the defendant's health at the time of the above testimony, and that the crime of this case committed the crime of this case even after the defendant was warned of the punishment of perjury in court, there is a need to punish the crime of this case as a violation of the State punishment right. The court below seems to have determined the amount of fine by fully considering the circumstances in the grounds for appeal, there was no special circumstance or circumstance that the court below had determined the amount of fine after the sentence of the judgment below, and there was no change in the motive and means of the crime of this case, the motive and consequence of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the contents and the relation of the testimony of this case, and the sentencing in the records.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.