2. It is recognized that there are circumstances that can be considered in sentencing, such as the fact that the defendant is against the judgment and the health of the pregnant woman supported by the defendant is worse.

However, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 times or punishment for the violation of the Road Traffic Act, such as drinking and unlicensed driving, and was sentenced to 10 times or two times during the suspension period, and the Defendant was sentenced to 7,00,000 won or more on September 13, 2012 at the Cheongju District Court for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of Drinking Measures) and again committed the instant drinking and unlicensed driving again after September 13, 2012. The blood alcohol concentration is considerably high to 0.284%, and all other circumstances constituting the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the background of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, are considered as inappropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.