beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.04 2012가합63163

손해배상(지)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Name of the instant patent invention 1: B2) / 2 of the original application date / d/ F 3: Claim 4) (Patent Claim 1 as at the time of the Plaintiff’s request for correction before November 22, 2012) / [ Claim 1] slot cell device (hereinafter “Composition 1-(hereinafter “Organization 2”) with two or more functions different from those of the upper body equipped with the DNA display window (hereinafter “Composition 2”) / 6 of the instant Claim 1: When the two copies of the above upper body are moved to one direction of the lower body (hereinafter “Organization 3”) / 6 of the instant Claim 1: The two copies of the instant Claim 2, which are open to the public with the same direction as at least one copy of the instant Claim 4 (hereinafter “St. 4”) / 1, 2002, are kept open to the public with the same direction as at least one copy of the instant Claim 1-2.

1. Although it falls under “design” actually, it is called “Invention” for convenience.

(A) / Publication / Publication.