beta
(영문) 광주고등법원 2016.01.28 2014누235

산재요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 18, 1993, the Plaintiff entered the Gwangju Factory Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “UAHAP”) as a contractual position and converted into a regular position on September 15, 1994, and thereafter worked in B by June 27, 2010, and thereafter transferred to C.

B. On January 11, 2012, the Plaintiff applied for medical care benefits (hereinafter “instant medical care application”) to the Defendant on the ground that “the Plaintiff, around 03:30 on July 30, 201, was faced with an accident, plucking, plucking, etc. of trees (hereinafter “instant accident”) due to the wind that the Plaintiff was seated in the night work atmosphere, and went beyond the base, and was engaged in the work that mainly imposes a burden on the upper sway for about 17 years, and that there was no apparent causal relation between the Plaintiff’s medical record and the medical record of the instant accident (hereinafter “the instant medical record application”). However, the Defendant did not have to consider the medical record of the instant case on the ground that there was no apparent causal relation between the Plaintiff’s personal injury and the instant medical record on the ground that there was no apparent causal relation between the instant accident and the medical record of the instant case.”

C. On July 11, 2012, the Plaintiff appealed to the instant disposition and filed a request for reexamination, but was dismissed on September 14, 2012.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 6 through 8, 12, Eul evidence 1 (including each number, hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion.