건물철거 등
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)
(a) Attached drawings among the lands listed in paragraph 1 of the Schedule of Real Estate;
A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.
1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and the purport of the whole arguments as a result of each request for appraisal by the Korea Land Information Corporation and the Director of the Korea Land Information Corporation and C corporation.
On June 30, 2005, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership on the land listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as “land listed in paragraph (1)”) and on December 14, 1994 on the land listed in Paragraph (2) of the same Table (hereinafter referred to as “paragraph (2),” and on the general term of the land listed in Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2) land. (b) On April 30, 1980, the Plaintiff completed each registration of ownership on the land listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1 of the Real Estate List No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”). However, on the other hand, on the land listed above the instant land, the Defendant owned the “land” and the “land listed in the instant column No. 177 square meters and the “land” or installed on June 26, 2014.
Order 1 paragraph A.
Since March 13, 2019, rent is KRW 269,000 per month as follows.
2. Determination on the main claim
A. According to the facts of recognition of removal and delivery claims, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant, which owns the portion of the “3” portion of the instant housing constructed on the instant land owned by the Plaintiff and the part of the “66” portion of the instant housing owned by the Plaintiff, has a duty to remove them to the Plaintiff and deliver the part of the “2” portion of the land and 5” portion without any title (hereinafter “bbb”, “c” portion, “v” portion, “v” portion, “v” portion, and “v” portion of the instant land.
B. In addition, the Defendant’s claim for unjust enrichment also obtains benefits without any legal grounds by using the land in dispute of the instant case.