If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Around October 28, 2011, the Defendant: (a) was merely a lessee who entered into a monthly rent contract with respect to the above C building 302; (b) was the person having a right to conceal it and claim a large amount of deposit; and (c) concluded a on- deposit contract with the victim E and received KRW 13.2 million as an intermediate payment, the Defendant: (a) the victim was aware of the payment of intermediate payment and the victim, who was the party who was the party having a right to claim a large amount of deposit; and (b) aided and aided the said D’s fraud by: (a) understanding that the Defendant would have been able to show two or more offices as the head; (b) I wish to believe that the person operating the company will be able to obtain; and (c) making it easier to commit the above D’s crime by using a joint and several surety.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against the accused D by the prosecution;

1. Statement of each police statement of E;

1. Investigation report (Confirmation of an account used for criminal administration);

1. Application of each letter, each real estate lease contract, and statutes governing notarial deeds;

1. Article 347 (1) or 32 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 32(2) and 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act for aiding and abetting and mitigation;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.