국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.
2. The Defendant’s patriarche of the two sides of the Plaintiff on June 16, 2015.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On May 30, 1970, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on October 31, 2001 as the Second Lieutenant to the Army.
B. On March 3, 2009, the Plaintiff filed an application for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that “the Plaintiff participated in the CRT training with aman in the middle of October 1971 and was injured on the face and bridge, such as coaches and ear, etc., while moving to the night-time purpose,” and that “the Plaintiff was injured on the GIC’s face and bridge” was applied for registration. However, on May 2009 and October 14, 2009, the Board of Patriots and Veterans decided to meet the requirements. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 21483, Oct. 2009; Presidential Decree No. 21456, Oct. 14, 2009>
C. After that, on December 22, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff “co-confected in the joint and several RCR training and moved to the purpose of night infiltration and sustained injuries in the face, such as ear and ear, and subsequently was exposed for a long time in noise while performing the duties of shooting control officers, etc.” with the application for registration of persons of distinguished service to the State.
On June 16, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision non-conformity with the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran's compensation on the ground that: (a) the Defendant suffered from wounds in the performance of duties or education and training directly related to national defense and security or the protection of people's lives and property; or (b) the Defendant cannot be deemed to have rapidly deteriorated at a level above the outbreak or the speed of natural progress due to the cause of performance of duties or education
E. The plaintiff's action of this case is "the disposition of this case in which the plaintiff rendered distinguished service to the person who rendered distinguished service to the State and the person eligible for veteran's compensation's compensation (hereinafter "the above case's injury") among the above applicant's injury."
A) The instant lawsuit was filed against the Plaintiff. [In the absence of a dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap’s 1 to 4, Eul’s 1 to 6, and 7, and the purport of the entire pleadings.]
2. The disposition is legitimate; and