When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 10:00 on June 16, 2017, the Defendant discovered that the Defendant was located in the above hospital without complying with the Defendant’s debt repayment promise from D Hospital 301, and he was removed from the Victim F (F, B, 61 years old), the Defendant, who was in the above E, was in the face of the victim’s head, and was in the face of the victim’s right side with the victim’s head f (W, 61 years old).

As a result, the Defendant inflicted double damage on the victim for about 14 days that requires medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A investigative report (CCTV Analysis and Investigation), a caps photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Provisional Payment Order, even if considering the background leading up to the instant crime, etc., the Defendant did not agree with the victim, and does not reveal any circumstances that led to the recovery of damage, and the Defendant had a record of having been sentenced to a fine for the same crime even in 2016, cannot be deemed to have excessive fines in light of the fact that the amount of fine specified in the summary order cannot be deemed to have been imposed.