However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 6, 2020, at the victim C and the OE stores operated by Goyang-dong-dong-gu-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si (U.S.) around 16:48, the Defendant used two raw water (2L) owned by the victims whose market price is equivalent to 3,000 won, and one tobacco (2L) owned by the victims whose market price is equivalent to 4,500 won.

2. The Defendant injured the victim by assaulting, at the convenience store indicated in Paragraph 1 at around 16:58, around 16:58, the day indicated in Paragraph 1, the victim was injured by the knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne.

3. From the date and time stated in paragraph (1), the Defendant committed an act, such as theft of things, assaulting victims, etc. at the convenience store as described in paragraphs (1) and (2).

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the convenience store operation by force for about 10 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure and the list of seizure, the list of victims and field photographs, photographs damaged by parts, such as victims D, and each investigation report (Evidence Nos. 12,13) shall be made;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 257 (1) and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act: Along with the victim's convenience store operated by the victims, the victims and their customers had interviewed with the victim about committing a theft and had committed a theft again on the convenience store, and exercised violence against the victims corresponding thereto.

The circumstances after the crime are not good after the escape after the crime.

In this case.