However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 18:30 on September 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol together with “Estus” operated by “Estus” by the victim D (AF) who is the spouse in Sincho-si C, the Defendant 49 years of age; (b) while drinking alcohol, the victim she was frightened, and was frighted with the victim’s head.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous things and put two parts of the body where it is impossible to identify the days of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the case

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation of crimes under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 553 of the Criminal Act provides that the crimes are inferior in light of the criminal records of the accused, the criminal records of the victim who is the wife, the fact that the accused recognizes the crimes, the fact that

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation)

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;