사기
All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that the Defendants are obliged to notify the victims of the plans to use the funds as operating expenses of lesinging and grounding in light of relevant regulations or social rules and empirical rules while receiving the funds for outstanding players or the scholarships from the victim E organizations or D universities, but the Defendants are obligated to notify the victims of the plans to use the funds as operating expenses of lesing and grounding. However, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendants of each of the facts charged of this case on the ground that the Defendants’ act did not
2. The lower court, on the grounds of appeal, has the duty to notify M or D University of the fact that the Defendants’ act may be inappropriate accounting and operating methods, on the grounds of the same circumstances as the written in Part 5 to the end of Part 8, the fourth part of the lower judgment.
Inasmuch as it is difficult to see that the above institution constitutes deception, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to find the Defendants guilty of each of the charges in this case. In comparison with the above judgment of the court below, it is just and acceptable in light of a thorough examination by comparing the above judgment of the court below with the records, and there is no error of law of misunderstanding
3. The appeal against the Defendants by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.