Judgment

Even though the defendant was punished four times for the same crime, and was punished three times as double punishment, the defendant habitually stolen goods and withdrawn cash with credit cards used in the victim's bank during the repeated crime period of the same crime, and did not make any effort to recover the victims' damage, and taking into account all the sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to appeal.