1. The Defendant committed on April 6, 2009, around April 6, 2009, and around 1113, the Gangnam-gu Seoul building C, and the facts were lawfully acquired a new manufacturing license of the so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called “defame,” and the judgment of the first instance court of a civil lawsuit instituted against the Defendant by 200 was clearly decided that the acquisition process of the so-called so-called “defame, etc.” was illegal, although the first instance court did not have clearly decided that the process of acquiring the so-called so-called so-called “defame, etc.,” which was transferred from 200 and sold the so-called so-called “D” in the debate board on the so-called “the next Gara,” which was an Internet site, began to sell so-called “D”, and it was clearly proven that it violated the relevant laws and regulations at the time of acquisition of the so-called “so-called “sofameme” in the process of acquisition.

On March 27, 2008, 2008, 2008, 2000 million won filed a criminal complaint on the ground that the author argued the illegality of the acquisition process of the manufacture ‘the same as me,' and 500 million won in the civil lawsuit.

Civil litigation was dismissed at the trial on March 25, 2009, and the plaintiff's claim was rejected without merit, and the improper implications of the manufacturing license acquisition process was also stated.

Although the judgment of the above civil procedure clearly revealed that the "production license" was illegally acquired, since the civil procedure in question is a claim for damages filed in the two islands, it cannot be directly revoked the manufacture license, and it will not be possible to make the complete withdrawal in the market through the active procedure in the future and make the relevant persons who have committed the illegal acts a serious reprimand.

recently.