In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Defendant

B On November 10, 2009, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment for embezzlement, and the enforcement of the sentence was terminated on May 11, 201 at the Incheon Detention House.

Defendant

B A around November 201, Defendant A, who was living together at the same time, planned to purchase a heavy vehicle by means of an installment loan, and was unable to obtain a loan by using a bad credit holder, and the Defendant A consented to this, and the Defendants purchased a heavy vehicle under the name of the Defendants, and conspired to divide the sales proceeds by selling the vehicle.

Defendant

B around December 1, 2011, in D, which is located in the Seoul metropolitan building No. 302, Dong-dong 302, Nam-gu, Incheon, Dong-gu, Seoul, and the defendant Eul purchased the car of the E body-man in the name of the defendant Eul, and the victim A was trying to enter into an alternative contract on behalf of the victim A as it is impossible for A to make it available for the company," and the defendant A prepared a written agreement stating that "a loan of KRW 15 million in the name of the above vehicle to purchase the above vehicle and redeem it in 619,640 won every month for 36 months," and the defendant A responded to the fact that he purchases the vehicle by receiving a confirmation telephone from the damaged company.

However, Defendant B was a person with bad credit standing at the time, and there was no certain amount of tax equivalent to KRW 13 million in arrears, and Defendant A did not have any other property or income, and the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to pay the amount even if they were to obtain a loan from the victim.

The Defendants conspired with the above employees who could not know their names, and caused the victim company to pay 15 million won of the purchase price of the vehicle to the "D" as the company of the second class trading on the same day, thereby obtaining economic benefits equivalent to the above amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The police statement concerning F;

1.Report of investigation report, annexed to the register of motor vehicles;