However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 17, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the management of the victim’s convenience store by force of about 20 minutes, such as taking the victim’s convenience store management by force, on the ground that the victim’s attitude referred to in the victim’s “nicking” is a bad, while the victim D (29 taxes) with drinking water in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 2017 was involved in the correction of the foregoing.

2. On September 18, 2017, the Defendant reported himself to the police around 06:30 to 07:15 on September 18, 2017, and found him again at the convenience store under the preceding paragraph. The Defendant informed the victim D of harm and injury that “I am aware of it,” and that “I am informed of it,” and that I am the beer who purchased before the convenience store, and was refused to purchase beer from the victim, and that I am informed of the harm and injury.”

On the other hand, the Defendant continued to pose a threat to the victim with a brush pipe outside of the convenience store, and as such, appears to have cut the cans with teared cans, etc., the Defendant engaged in the facts charged, such as “as sold in the brush of beer.”

However, according to the evidence records 10, 101, the defendant was found to have teared cans of beer and sold in the teared part, and even if recognized, it does not affect the guarantee of the defendant's right to defense. Thus, the facts charged should be modified and recognized ex officio.

In addition, the facts charged are indicated as "the act of taking gasoline and finding again at the convenience store" by intimidation. However, the defendant consistently stated that the defendant purchased gasoline for the purpose of inserting it in the otobb that was used by ordinary employees, not for threatening the victim, and the staff of the gas station who sold gasoline to the defendant is also the staff of the defendant.