건물명도
1. The part against the plaintiff against the defendant C among the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.
2. Defendant C shall list the Plaintiff’s attached list.
1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420
2. Under the fourth page of the parts to be dried or added, the phrase “each real estate” shall be read as “each real estate (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”)”.
Part 7 "T" shall be raised to "AH".
Part 7, Part 12 and Part 10 "No. 11" shall be deemed to be "No. 111".
The following shall be added between pages 7, 17 and 18:
Article 2 Subparag. 9 of the Rules on Housing Supply (wholly amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation No. 137, Jun. 15, 1998) provides that "the owner of a non-family household means the head of a household, including the head of a household (including the spouse of the head of a household who is not registered in the same resident registration card as the head of a household and the spouse of the head of a household who is the same household as the head of a household) who does not own a house."
According to the above evidence, Gap evidence, and the purport of Gap evidence No. 20 and the whole pleadings, defendant C's spouse's transfer of ownership with respect to 25.42 square meters on the ground of U-owned Ma-Maon on August 6, 1991, but completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 17, 199. The defendant C shall be deemed to have lost the requirements for non-family households as he owns another house during the term of lease and thus the third lease contract was not implicitly renewed. Thus, the above argument by defendant C is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and the part against the plaintiff against the defendant C in the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair in conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.