게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for not less than two years, probation, community service order for not more than 20 hours, confiscation, and collection) that the court below sentenced is too uneasible and unreasonable.
2. Even after the decision-making accomplice E has controlled the police, it continues to engage in money exchange activities in the same game room after changing the name of the owner of the business for the purpose of recovering the invested expenses, and there is a record of having been sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime in 2007.
However, in full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the period of operation of the instant game room is relatively short; (c) the suspension of the operation of the instant game room; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, circumstance, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (d) other various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the circumstances before and after the instant crime, it cannot be deemed that the lower
The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.
3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.