2. The judgment was examined, and the defendant recognized and reflected the crime of this case, and there was no criminal record of the same kind, and the statement of agreement with the victim was submitted.

However, in full view of various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the fact that only some of the amount of fraud was recovered, the victim wants to punish the defendant, and the crime of this case was committed by the defendant using the personal trust relationship with the victim, and the nature of the crime is not good, and there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.