When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 2, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced by the Busan District Court to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business, which became final and conclusive on September 30, 2016.

1. On August 13, 2015, the defrauded: (a) around 06:10 on August 13, 2015, the Defendant took advantage of the following financial benefits: (b) within the convenience store operated by the victims of the victim’s name in Busan Shodong-gu B; and (c) despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price, the Defendant took advantage of the same pecuniary benefits by taking out one of the 2,800 won of the market price, 1,100 won of 2,80 won of the market price, 1,100 won of 1,100 won of

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store business, who is an employee, by 10 minutes of the number of customers, by putting the horses “snick in the convenience store”; (b) putting the horses “low snick in the convenience store,” and putting customers out of the room, and putting them out of the room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Investigation report (including receipts and photographs);

1. Previouss before ruling: The application of statutes to criminal records, written judgments, and results of the search of Konet case;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The latter part of Articles 37 and 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes [the amount of fine determined by the summary order in consideration of equity in cases where the judgment is to be judged simultaneously with the crime of interference with business decided upon];

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;