However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 2, 2012, the Defendant paid the victim D’s residence located in Gwangju-si building 103, and the Defendant paid monthly installments and bank interest, etc. at the time of Mabner loan, and there was no particular income. As to E 301 in Gwangju-si, the Industrial Bank of Korea established a right to collateral security of 37.2 million won, and E-301, which was owned by the Defendant, was seized by E-U.S., and the lessee of the foregoing house bears the obligation to refund the lease deposit amount of 70 million won. As such, even if the Defendant borrowed the money from the victim, the Defendant received KRW 1 million monthly payment from the Plaintiff and received KRW 20 million from the Plaintiff on April 2, 2013 and received KRW 20 million for the lease deposit and the premium of the newly operated restaurant and paid KRW 100,0000,0000 to the victim on February 13, 2012.

2. On November 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around the victim D’s residence; and (b) the Defendant was paying monthly vehicle installments and bank loan interest at the time of Masp loan; (c) there was no particular income; (d) the Industrial Bank of Korea set up a collateral security amount of KRW 37.2 million with respect to E 301 in Gwangju City owned by the Defendant; (c) the lessee of the said house was liable for the repayment of the lease deposit amount of KRW 70 million; and (d) the Defendant was liable for the repayment of the lease deposit to the lessee of the said house; and (e) even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to return the money, but lent KRW 10 million to the victim as the cost of the Maspian construction project at the

From May 2013 to May 2012, 200.