2. The judgment of the court below is accepted as a whole for the crime committed in the past and reflects on the fact that some damaged goods were temporarily returned to the victim; the crime of this case steals property on the day of employment by means of a disguised employment at various convenience points for the purpose of larceny; the crime of this case steals another person's mobile phone; the owner of another person's mobile phone after thefting it; the crime of this case is poor in light of the method of the crime, etc.; the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime; each of the crimes of this case has the past history of punishment for the same crime; each of the crimes of this case has been committed on October 17, 2014 after the execution of punishment was completed; the victim's punishment was committed during the repeated crime period; the victim's total amount reaches KRW 8 million; the victim's motive for the crime of larceny; the sentencing conditions after the crime of this case; the sentencing guidelines for each of the larceny crime of this case; the victim's punishment of this case has not yet been recovered yet; the victim's punishment for one year and one year and six months (one year and six (one year) additional).

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.