No one shall provide game products, the contents of which are different from those classified by the Game Rating Board for distribution or use.

A. From August 30, 2013 to September 16, 2016:50, Defendant A provided online game products called “Tang International War 2” at the instant game site to many unspecified customers, including G, by including a shotma game in the form of reproducing the horse in the “Tang International War 2” game, different from the time when it was rated by the first Game Rating Board, and offered it to many and unspecified customers, including G.

As a result, the Defendant provided game products with contents different from those rated by the Game Rating Board for use.

B. From September 19, 2013 to September 16, 2013, the Defendant, as an employee, assisted the business owner A to provide game products that are different from the rated contents, by inserting a ID and password so that many unspecified customers who find out the game can play the game, and explaining how to play the game, such as betting method, in order to facilitate the operation of the game by being aware of the operation of the game as a game product similar to any other game product similar to the game classified by A, as an employee.

C. From September 16, 2013 to September 16, 2016, the Defendant, as an employee, is needed in the game of the instant game room, in order to facilitate the operation of the game as a game product different from the game classified as above by the proprietor A, with the knowledge that he/she operated the game as a game product different from the game classified as above, Defendant C’s employee, and it is necessary in the game of the horse of the horse of the head of the instant game that provides the game product certificate “Il International War 2” to allow many unspecified customers to play the game.