When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 2, 2011, the Defendant: (a) caused damage to the victim D in Busan Eastdong-gu’s “Ecafeteria”); and (b) caused multiple disturbances at the same place, such as destroying the victim D’s cafeteria.

At around 14:00 on January 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sought a doping that the said victim(s) will be subject to apology; (b) again, obstructed the victim’s business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 20 minutes; (c) “I am dead; (d) I am dead; and (e) I am dead. I am dead. I am dead. I am am. I am.. I am.)” and doing his behavior as I am.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the statement of D;

1. Relevant Articles 314(1) and 314(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of a fine (including the fact that the circumstances are not good for committing an offense during the period of suspension of execution of punishment, but the degree of interference with business is not much severe, and the fact that it reflects

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;