However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 6, 2017, the Defendant provided meals to improve wife D, ASEAN and their family relationship that left away from the Defendant’s violence, etc. on July 6, 2017, on the ground that E is a defendant’s past mistake, and that E is a defendant’s misunderstanding, the Defendant took a bath by threatening D, who met from E, E, I, and I, to the Defendant’s illness.

Accordingly, E has come to go away from E due to the fact that the violence of the defendant occurred in the damaged area.

1. A special intimidation: (a) around July 6, 2017, at around 20:42, the Defendant was living in the Defendant’s apartment F apartment unit located in Busan Northern-gu, Busan; (b) the Victim E (23 Do) who entered the Defendant’s house to damage the Defendant and did not open this door, and the Defendant’s vehicle’s hacker (35 cm in length), draber (23 cm in length), hacker (23 cm in length, 42 cm in length, 21 cm in length), hacks (21 cm in length in length); and (c) the Defendant hacked the entrance with the hacker and drick, and hacked with a large volume of voice “h and hacks down in inside the inside the inside”.

The Defendant carried such dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the same time, at the same place as the preceding 1.3 time, and at the same time and place as the preceding 1.3 times, and as seen above, opened the Defendant’s house door door with the Defendant’s house door door, and was removed from H, the police officer, who was called out after receiving the report of 112 domestic violence of the above E, from the background leading up to the Busan Northern Police Station G District, the Busan Northern Police Station: “Isson’s house inside the house, is incidental, and you open the door, and Ra’s door, Isman’s house, and rashed the above H’s part.”

As such, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to E and H;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 284, 283(1) (a) and 136(1) (a) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (a special intimidation) of the same Act and the choice of punishment.