A. In light of the various sentencing conditions of the Defendant, the lower court’s imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence (ten months of imprisonment) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In full view of the various circumstances, including the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case as a crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, etc., or the fact that the crime of this case is of significant importance in light of the applicable method of punishment and the degree of damage, the crime of this case is not recovered yet, and there is no change in circumstances that are likely to vary between the court below and the court below, and there is no change in circumstances that make the sentencing conditions, such as the age-oriented environment of the defendant, the punishment imposed by the court below is too heavy or unreasonable. Thus, the defendant and the prosecutor's assertion disputing this issue are without merit.

3. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.