2. The Defendant recognized that all of the instant crimes were committed, thereby constituting a misunderstanding.

The defendant, while working in several companies, attempted to commit the remaining accompanying suicide by taking care of his position due to his duty into account the circumstances leading up to the crime, and the articles owned by D were returned to his bereaved family.

On the other hand, the defendant seems to have committed a crime of special larceny, etc. in a short period after withdrawal from the workplace, and most of the thefts including special larcenys were returned to the victims.

The victimO and AC agreed with the victim, and the victims do not want to be punished for the defendant, and the victim V expressed the victim's intention not to be punished in the investigative agency.

The defendant has no record of criminal punishment prior to the crime of this case.

These points are favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant posted a letter on the finding of a person who will commit suicide accompanied by social relation network services, and aided and abetted the suicide of D by searching the place of suicide and attempting to commit a accompanied suicide together with D.

This act of aiding and abetting suicide needs to be punished strictly as a crime that intrudes another person's life.

The defendant has concealed D's automobiles, etc. in order to steals D's property and conceal crimes without being able to do so.

The nature of the crime is not good in light of the aforementioned details of the crime, such as aiding and abetting suicide and larceny, the method of taking the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

In addition, the defendant has damaged the facility by using the tool prepared in advance for the convenience store shocking network at night prior to the crime of suicide aiding and abetting.