A. Both the Plaintiffs and the Defendants are the members of the F clans (hereinafter referred to as “foreign clans”). The Plaintiff’s representative, the Plaintiff’s auditor, the Plaintiff’s auditor, and the Plaintiff’s general director, and Defendant D’s auditor and Defendant E are performing the duties of the non-party clans.

B. On April 11, 2016, the Plaintiffs and the clan G shall hold an executive board meeting to distribute and dispose of the area of 6,502 square meters, the area of 3,871 square meters prior to I, and the area of 1,223 square meters prior to J, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, which is each land owned by the non-party clan (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”). Of these, the Plaintiff and the clan shall have a 3,530 square meters out of the area of 6,502 square meters prior to Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and 3,871 square meters prior to I, and 1,000 square meters out of the 3,50 square meters prior to I,871 square meters, among the 6,502 square meters prior to H, the Plaintiff’s 1,223 square meters out of the 6,502 square meters prior to the Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and the Plaintiff’s deposit of the said 381,2500 square meters prior to the Daejeon.

C. After that, the Defendants filed a complaint against the Plaintiffs as the Defendant, on the grounds of occupational embezzlement and occupational breach of trust, and the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office imposed a non-guilty measure on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence as to the Plaintiffs' above suspicion. While the Defendants appealed to the Daejeon High Prosecutors' Office, the Daejeon High Prosecutors' Office dismissed the Defendants' complaint on February 7, 2017.

On February 2017, the Defendants filed an application for adjudication with Daejeon High Court 2017 Seocho Jae-156, but the Daejeon High Court dismissed the said application for adjudication thereafter.

[Ground of Recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 4, 5, Gap evidence 6-1, 2, Gap evidence 7, Gap evidence 10-2, Gap evidence 16-2, Eul evidence 2-1 through 3, Eul evidence 4-1 through 3, Eul evidence 6-1 and Eul evidence 6-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The part of the claim for consolation money as to mental damage sustained by the defendants' complaint.