A. Defendant Hyundai Motor Vehicle Branch, A, B, D, F, G, L, N, R, T, U, W, X,Y, Z, and AA respectively.

A. The Plaintiff Company is a legal entity engaged in the automobile manufacturing business, etc., and Defendant Y, Z, and AA are the Ulsan Factory of the Plaintiff Company (hereinafter “instant plant”).

2) Defendant Hyundai Motor Irregular Branch (hereinafter “Defendant Labor Union”) is the Plaintiff Company branch of the metal trade union affiliated with the Federation of the Korean Democratic Trade Union (hereinafter “MMM”) consisting of workers belonging to the in-house subcontractor of the instant plant.

3) Defendant AB; Defendant C, D, and V worked for Defendant E; Defendant E; Defendant F, R; U.S.; Defendant H to AF; Defendant H to AH; Defendant J; Defendant J and K to AI; Defendant H to AJ; Defendant M to AK; Defendant N; Defendant N to Defendant N; Defendant N; Defendant Q to AK; Defendant Q to AM; Defendant Q to AM; and Defendant Q to AO; and Defendant Q to AO; and Defendant X to AP; and each of the above Defendants working for the said Defendants is a member of the company of the factory of this case; and (b) Defendant Trade Union has consistently requested the Plaintiff Company to convert all of the workers belonging to the Plaintiff into the Plaintiff Company into the full-time employees of the Plaintiff Company.

2) On July 22, 2010, Supreme Court Decision 2008Du4367 (No. 2008Du4367) reversed and remanded to the effect that the Plaintiff would be directly employed by the Plaintiff in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations, as the Plaintiff Company was dispatched to the Plaintiff Company on July 22, 2010 and used A Q for more than two years, with respect to the revocation lawsuit against the rejection of the application for unfair dismissal against Q, a worker employed by

As the Defendant’s Trade Union declared “B”, from October 6, 2010 to May 1, 201 of the same year, raised the wages of KRW 90,982, such as basic pay to the Plaintiff Company through metal labor unions on four occasions from around October 6, 2010, and converted all employees working for the intra-company subcontractor into full-time employees of all the Plaintiff Company, and at the same time, unpaid wages as of the date of entry of the intra-company subcontractor workers.