beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2021.01.22 2020고단776

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 2, 2020, the Defendant suffered injury from “C” in the Daegu-gu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, about 05:15, where the Defendant: (a) was at the drinking toilet, and the Defendant was at the front-faced victim D (20 years of age) with a locker’s own hand, and was authorized to use drinking water; and (b) the Defendant was at the victim who was knifed “n only in n only in n’s hand,” the Defendant was at the seat of the victim on one occasion.

Defendant continued to wear the victim’s shoulder and to sit with the Defendant’s tables, and then “I wish to die.”

“The plastic water can be collected towards the victim’s face,” and approximately two weeks’ eyes were laid to the victim’s face. In response, approximately two weeks’ eyes were laid to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim.

2. A special intimidation: (a) the Defendant continued to leave an empty Sicker’s disease on the table at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1; (b) broken it up; and (c) shown the attitude that the relevant smallerer’s disease, which is a dangerous object, seems to inflict an injury on the chest of the said victim D.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The application of statutes to the defendant's legal statement D to report internal history of the police's statement, on-site photographic injury diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Articles 284 and 283(1) (the point of special intimidation) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes appears to have the attitude of admitting and opposing the defendant's wrongness, the defendant received a letter by agreement with the victim, the victim again desires the defendant, and the defendant at the beginning of the 20th century has yet to be able to return to a sound social member.

However, in light of the contents of each of the crimes in this case, the nature of the crime is bad and the injured party.