대여금
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The parties' assertion
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Defendant B is the Plaintiff’s form, and Defendant C is the wife of Defendant B. (2) The Plaintiff owned the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E apartment 29 Dong 209 (hereinafter “E apartment”), but the Defendants requested the Plaintiff to lend the E apartment as security.
Accordingly, on June 30, 1994, the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 30,000,000 from the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation (hereinafter “CF”) and lent the said money to the Defendants. On September 30, 1998, the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 27,000,000 from the Nonghyup and again borrowed the said money to the Defendants.
In addition, on March 27, 1996, the Plaintiff offered apartment houses as security, and loaned the above money to the Defendants with a total of KRW 76,000,000 from the Promotion Mutual Savings and Finance Company (hereinafter “Promotion Mutual Savings and Finance Company”). Since then, upon requesting the Defendants to lend additional money, the Defendants borrowed KRW 100,000,000 from the Promotion Mutual Savings and Finance Company on December 29, 1998 with a loan of KRW 1,00,000 by means of a substitute loan from the Promotion Mutual Savings and Finance Company, and then repaid the existing loan with the above loan and re-loan the remaining money to the Defendants.
The defendants, even after the plaintiff's appeal for difficult circumstances, would be able to purchase the same apartment at an early date when they leased the proceeds for the sale of the apartment. The plaintiff sold the apartment and asked to lend the proceeds for the sale of the apartment. The plaintiff sold the apartment and borrowed the proceeds for the sale to the defendants.
On April 30, 199, the Defendants sold E apartment units of KRW 180,000,000 and carried out the proceeds from sale. The Defendants loaned KRW 127,000,000 among the proceeds from sale to KRW 127,000,000, and repaid the existing loans of KRW 127,000 (i.e., agricultural loans of KRW 100,000,000) (i.e., the promoted mutual savings bank). As a result, the Defendants paid KRW 180,00,000 from the Plaintiff on April 30, 199.