The request of applicants for compensation shall be dismissed.

On November 18, 2017, the Defendant reported that “A victim D would purchase a flat crowdfunding” on the Internet camera-dong, Busan, Seocheon-gu, Busan, 2017, posted a false statement to the effect that “A victim D would sell a flat crowdfunding to KRW 1.80,000,000.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not engage in the sale of securities.

The Defendant, as seen above, received KRW 180,000 from the victims totaling KRW 8,852,80 from the victims over 29 times from February 2, 2018, including the transfer of KRW 180,000 from the victims to the F account in the name of the Defendant’s name as the price for the goods on the same day.

The Defendant, around January 22, 2018, at the end of 2018, sold the right to use J, “I” on the Blob of the Internet evaded site in Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul, and “I sell the right to use use.”

“The victim K, who reported and contacted the above writing, made a false statement to the effect that “The Justice will sell the right to use J 50,000 won.”

However, the defendant did not have the right to sell.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was transferred 50,000 won from the victim to the L account (Account Number M) in the name of the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

On December 10, 2017, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “(s) access to the I N’s website at a non-permanent place of Busan Northern-dong (hereinafter referred to as Seocheon-dong),” and then send two copies of the contact book if the Defendant sent KRW 290,000 to the P who reported and contacted the above, to the victim P.

was made.

However, the defendant did not possess tweet, and even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell it.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and is the same day as the victim.